Most people treat this as a market prediction problem.
It is not.
In Singapore, property timing is primarily a resilience question: can your decision survive realistic interest rates, flat prices, and a longer-than-expected holding period?
Fast Path (use this order)
Factor 1 — Holding Period
Factor 2 — Interest Rate Sensitivity
Factor 3 — Liquidity Buffer
If rates rise from 3.5% to 4.0%, total 5-year interest drag increases materially. If your cashflow margin is thin, this change alone can shift the decision.
At this scale, small percentage changes in rates translate into larger absolute dollars. Condo timing is therefore more sensitive if buffers are thin.
Flat prices (0% growth)
Can you still justify the decision based purely on use and long-term holding?
Mild rise (1–2% annually)
Upside improves resilience, but should not be assumed.
Mild decline (-5% over period)
If this breaks your plan, your structure was speculative.
Buyer friction (BSD + legal) and seller friction (agent + legal) do not shrink just because your timeline shrinks.
Selling in 2 years instead of 5 compresses those fixed costs into a shorter period, amplifying timing risk.
| Factor | HDB Resale | Condo |
|---|---|---|
| Entry friction | Moderate | Higher (BSD larger absolute) |
| Ongoing fixed cost | Lower | MCST always-on |
| Rate sensitivity | Moderate | Higher absolute exposure |
| Short-hold risk | Elevated | Higher |
Buy Now if:
Wait if:
Waiting does not guarantee:
It simply delays capital lock-up. If waiting strengthens your buffers and resilience, it can be rational. If waiting is based purely on prediction, it is still speculative.
A good property decision should survive:
If your structure survives that, “buy now vs wait” becomes execution timing — not speculation.